When You Should Compete In Crowded Markets
When I was in b-school, I read Blue Ocean Strategy and its message resonated with me immediately like many ideas that feel intuitively true.
The framing is simple: mature markets are red oceans. They’re crowded, competitive, and as a result—unappealing. Red oceans should be avoided.
Blue oceans, on the other hand, are entirely new markets. They’re uncontested and unsaturated. Blue oceans should be pursued.
I mostly agree with this framing. But sometimes, there are good reasons to pursue an opportunity in a red ocean.
A recent LinkedIn post from Wes Bush explains one of the best reasons. Red oceans usually mean there’s money in the market, and a lot of it. Red ocean markets are competitive because the opportunity is large and real, regardless of whether you can extract value from it.
Wes’s post got me thinking about a few other reasons why red oceans can still be viable. Here are three.
1) Niches can survive in red oceans
Red ocean markets are extreme signals of product-market fit (e.g. lots of people willing to pay for a product). They become more viable if you plan to stay focused on a small niche.
Carving out a small corner of a red ocean is like finding a purple (or even blue) pocket in a sea of red. It’s hard, but not impossible.
2) You may have a contextually relevant advantage
It can also make sense to pursue red oceans if you have a competitive advantage that others don’t.
Resources, talent, distribution, and brand are all advantages that can help you outlast competitors in a red ocean. The caution here is just not to be overconfident about your perceived advantage.
Note: If you reflexively think “we’re different” or “that won’t happen to us,” be skeptical that you actually have a durable advantage.
3) Blue oceans that aren’t really blue
Blue oceans can be large, uncontested spaces for value creation. They can also be uncontested for a reason–there’s no value to capture.
The only thing worse than a red ocean competition is blue ocean apathy. Who cares if something is uncontested if no one wants it?
In these cases, a red ocean, while competitive, may still be your best opportunity.
So before you completely write off a market as a red ocean, ask yourself:
Is the opportunity large enough to sustain more than one winner long term if I niche down?
Do I have a real, durable advantage that others don’t?
Is this market a blue ocean for a reason or a mirage?

Really strong point about blue ocean apathy versus red ocean competition. The reflexive avoidance of crowded markets misses that competition itself is often proof of real demand. I've seen teams chase 'unique' spaces only to discover why they were empty in the first place. The niche carving idea also resonatesfor me, finding that purple pocket requires knowing the market well enough to spot where others cant reach.